.... thanks Gavin I have always been interested in this strategy and I definitely think there is some scope for improvement here. I tested another ten races today and although I did not make a fortune, I did not have huge losses either. Just requires some fine tuning I think. Here are today's results:-
10 Races tested from 16.00pm.
Only the first race where only one lay was matched, and surprisingly it was matched at 1.43 when the program was supposed to be matched at 1.61. Why was this Gavin?
Then I had six races where no leading horse got through to lay.
And the icing on the Cherry I had three races where there were two horses matched as lays. The second, third and fifth races yielded these successes.
The second race had horses matched at 1.61 and 1.53.
The third race had horses matched at 1.61 and 1.61.
The fifth race had horses matched at 1.14 and 1.30.
So, Gavin can you advise why some of these odd matches took place when the program was set to lay at 1.61? The loss we had at race one should never have happened surely as the program should have cut the lay out at 1.61. Is this not so?